Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
mSphere ; 6(3)2021 05 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1226714

ABSTRACT

Serology (antibody) tests to detect previous SARS-CoV-2 infection have been in high demand from the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. The initial shortage of diagnostic tests coupled with asymptomatic infections led to a significant demand for serology tests to identify past infections. Despite serious limitations on the interpretation of a positive antibody test in terms of immunity to SARS-CoV-2, antibody testing was initially considered for release from social distancing, return to employment, and "immunity passports." The regulatory approach to antibody tests was limited; manufacturers were encouraged to develop and market antibody tests without submitting validation data to the FDA. FDA guidance grew more stringent, but many poor-quality tests were already on the market-potentially inappropriately used for individual decision-making. This is a case study describing COVID-19 serology tests and the U.S. market and describes lessons learned for a future health security crisis.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19 Serological Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Asymptomatic Infections , COVID-19 Serological Testing/history , COVID-19 Serological Testing/standards , Forecasting , Health Policy , Health Services Needs and Demand , History, 21st Century , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Marketing of Health Services , Politics , Quality Control , Sensitivity and Specificity , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration , Validation Studies as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL